<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Science Speak of Faith?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterflock.org/2007/06/should-science-speak-of-faith.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2007/06/should-science-speak-of-faith.html</link>
	<description>a site about everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Scroggins</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2007/06/should-science-speak-of-faith.html/comment-page-1#comment-10477</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Scroggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.patrickburleson.com/?p=5808#comment-10477</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yes, Science is allowed to talk about religion because Science allows anyone else to talk, criticize and debate Science&#039;s beliefs.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s my view of the matter as well--thanks for commenting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, Science is allowed to talk about religion because Science allows anyone else to talk, criticize and debate Science&#8217;s beliefs.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s my view of the matter as well&#8211;thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShieldedM</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2007/06/should-science-speak-of-faith.html/comment-page-1#comment-10476</link>
		<dc:creator>ShieldedM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.patrickburleson.com/?p=5808#comment-10476</guid>
		<description>In his book, Demon Haunted World, Carl Sagan pointed out that science has the unique feature of accepting critiques and to critique with arguments: if and only if those arguments have gone through the scientific process of trial and error...  This unique feature is one feature that religion lacks, religious representatives think of religion as the ultimate truth, and condemn anything that goes against their beliefs.

In short... Yes, Science is allowed to talk about religion because Science allows anyone else to talk, criticize and debate Science&#039;s beliefs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his book, Demon Haunted World, Carl Sagan pointed out that science has the unique feature of accepting critiques and to critique with arguments: if and only if those arguments have gone through the scientific process of trial and error&#8230;  This unique feature is one feature that religion lacks, religious representatives think of religion as the ultimate truth, and condemn anything that goes against their beliefs.</p>
<p>In short&#8230; Yes, Science is allowed to talk about religion because Science allows anyone else to talk, criticize and debate Science&#8217;s beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

