<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: at the risk of sentimentality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/04/at-the-risk-of-sentimentality.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/04/at-the-risk-of-sentimentality.html</link>
	<description>thoughts, questions, original art and content and links to stuff we think is of interest; a group blog dedicated to pretty much everything. by people you would like to meet at a party; proof of intelligent life on the planet; inhabited by Internet hunter gatherers in the pre-apocalyptic realm; a destination that offers constellations of stimulating links to popular (and not so popular) culture; a group blog dedicated to culture: art, design, music, food, architecture, science, travel, movies, books, typography, politics, etc.; inclusive of geezers!; a delightful mixture of orange words and pictures of well, the insides of a stuffed animal–delightful all the same; the social network I never thought I’d join.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Buaas</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/04/at-the-risk-of-sentimentality.html/comment-page-1#comment-71576</link>
		<dc:creator>John Buaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=9575#comment-71576</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s right.
I realized something similar when I was in grad school: texts came to be regarded as something we could examine . . . as opposed to admire.  We read a lot of crappy stuff because, I&#039;m convinced, it lay still when we got the theory scalpels out.  You can imagine the papers we wrote.  And oh, how we loved Irony: it helped us keep those suspect emotions at an intellectual arm&#039;s length.  Granted, grad school isn&#039;t, nor should it be, mere Art Appreciation.  But reducing all considerations of texts to discussions of Race, Class and Gender got old after a while.
It was in the midst of those days that I discovered and read Blood Meridian for the first time.  Quite apart from its obvious merits was something else in its favor: it wouldn&#039;t lie still for the theory scalpels.  It simply was, as few novels are.
Weird how a novel--especially that one, given its subject matter--can keep one sane.  It reminded me of why I wanted to major in English in the first place.  It could not have come at a better time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s right.<br />
I realized something similar when I was in grad school: texts came to be regarded as something we could examine . . . as opposed to admire.  We read a lot of crappy stuff because, I&#8217;m convinced, it lay still when we got the theory scalpels out.  You can imagine the papers we wrote.  And oh, how we loved Irony: it helped us keep those suspect emotions at an intellectual arm&#8217;s length.  Granted, grad school isn&#8217;t, nor should it be, mere Art Appreciation.  But reducing all considerations of texts to discussions of Race, Class and Gender got old after a while.<br />
It was in the midst of those days that I discovered and read Blood Meridian for the first time.  Quite apart from its obvious merits was something else in its favor: it wouldn&#8217;t lie still for the theory scalpels.  It simply was, as few novels are.<br />
Weird how a novel&#8211;especially that one, given its subject matter&#8211;can keep one sane.  It reminded me of why I wanted to major in English in the first place.  It could not have come at a better time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.695 seconds -->
