June 20, 2008


“Playtime”


Harry W. Frees. Circa 1914. From a collection of prints featuring “humorous scenes of puppies and kittens dressed as humans and posed in human domestic situations”. Library of Congress Prints & Photographs Division.

comments

24 Responses to ““Playtime””

  1. Amy Mabli on June 20th, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    That is great. Thank you, Sheila!

  2. Sheila Ryan on June 20th, 2008 at 2:02 pm

    You’re welcome, Amy. I have an unwholesome fascination with this little niche of popular genre photography. Especially for images that put me in mind of a Brothers Quay film.

  3. Cindy Scroggins on June 20th, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    The Brothers Quay, indeed.

    I’ve turned a permanent corner, I’m afraid, because I’d like this much better if the kitties and little girl were taxidermied.

  4. Sheila Ryan on June 20th, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    I get kind of a funny feeling abut those kittens.

  5. Cindy Scroggins on June 20th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    Like maybe they’re dead? Nah. I’m pretty sure the doll’s dead, though. I mean, look at her eyes.

    I’m thinking about commissioning a kitten work from Tia. Thinking really hard.

  6. Sheila Ryan on June 20th, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    The kittens’ eyes, on the other hand, suggest they have seen things no kitten should be compelled to see. Sadder but wiser kittens, in other words.

  7. Cindy Scroggins on June 20th, 2008 at 2:42 pm

    Exactly. But not beyond the pale.

  8. Sheila Ryan on June 20th, 2008 at 2:47 pm

    Never beyond the pale. (Nor within the canon.)

  9. Tracy on June 20th, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Oh sure, they’re cute. But can they play poker?

  10. Sheila Ryan on June 20th, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    No. They leave poker to the puppies.

  11. Cindy Scroggins on June 20th, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    That does it. I’m getting me some dead kitty art.

  12. Sheila Ryan on June 20th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    If you are the sort of person who goes in for this sort of thing, you will find more of this sort of thing here.

  13. Kathy Hilen-Smith on June 20th, 2008 at 4:31 pm

    MGS bought a first edition “Toodles and her Friends” by Harry Whittier Frees at an antiques sale that we stumbled upon one afternoon while cruising the “T”. The inside cover is inscribed in giant scrawling script “Ronald Perkins, 2214 S. Main St.”

    I wish I could scan it for y’all, but I can’t. My guess is that Ronal Perkins was in 1st grade or so when he laid claim to this book with his pencil, These images are too much.

  14. Sheila Ryan on June 20th, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    Oh, Kathy, that’s great! I wish I still had my copy of a later book in the same vein, one of the Golden Books, titled “Three Little Puppies”. If nothing else, I’d scan and post a copy of the image of the Photographer Dog.

    (Do you and MGS own any of the books in this genre featuring monkeys? I like monkeys. They make me laugh.)

  15. Alek Lindus on June 21st, 2008 at 12:46 am

    Cindy i confess i’m somewhat fascinated with your fascination for taxidermy and the lengths it will go to
    they definately play black jack and roolet [sic] what with the 9 chances they have a piece, i’ve seen their names on the banned lists, the doll’s a decoy

  16. Sheila Ryan on June 21st, 2008 at 10:11 am

    Next time I’m in Las Vegas (or better yet, Monte Carlo) I will remember to distract the pit bosses with a Belle Epoque mannequin whilst I count cards at the blackjack table.

  17. Cindy Scroggins on June 21st, 2008 at 10:29 am

    Yes, Alek, my interest in taxidermy (especially, taxidermy art) is very strange–especially considering that I will not kill any living thing, even cockroaches, and have been a vegetarian for over 20 years. Go figure.

  18. Alek Lindus on June 21st, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    sheila i played one of those once for someone trying to get back in with a disguise and a decoy so when you decide to….

  19. Sheila Ryan on June 21st, 2008 at 3:34 pm

    Alek, I assume you were successful. This has potential. Problem is, I need to hone my own technique. The one and only time I counted cards was before I understood anything about it. I am a wretched games-player and will slink out of the room to avoid a game, any game, but one evening after dinner with friends and friends of friends, I was trapped into playing some card game or other (something even the children could play, after a fashion). I began to edge ahead steadily, when someone noted, “You can’t be very drunk. I think you must be counting cards.” At the time I wasn’t quite sure what was meant, but yes, that is what I was doing, and I triumphed over a table of drunk and distracted adults and their confident but confused children. I entertain grave doubts whether I could outwit the house, be it in Monte Carlo or Vegas, despite your doubtless considerable diversionary talents.

    Still, it could be a great deal of fun.

  20. Phil Bebbington on June 22nd, 2008 at 11:38 am

    I’d suggest playing the tables dressed as a kitten! Everyone loves kittens….you’re bound to win…as a distraction tactic alone it is a winner. I tried it once at a local fun fair…the trouble is a kitten with an air rifle shooting clay ducks from a rotating display is bound to attract attention!

    I think kitten suits have a future for sure!

  21. Sheila Ryan on June 22nd, 2008 at 2:22 pm

    Kitten with an air rifle, indeed. Mr Kitten!

  22. Alek Lindus on June 22nd, 2008 at 4:09 pm

    sheila, then we’ll play chance off against distraction, its bound to even the odds in a convergence

  23. Sheila Ryan on June 22nd, 2008 at 4:12 pm

    The secret of convergence, revealed at last! A mathematically precise balance between chance and distraction.

    Mum’s the word.

  24. Alek Lindus on June 22nd, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    all mums words and egg sucking grandmothers too

Leave a Reply