<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doctorow on Copyright Enforcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/07/doctorow-on-copyright-enforcement.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/07/doctorow-on-copyright-enforcement.html</link>
	<description>thoughts, questions, original art and content and links to stuff we think is of interest; a group blog dedicated to pretty much everything. by people you would like to meet at a party; proof of intelligent life on the planet; inhabited by Internet hunter gatherers in the pre-apocalyptic realm; a destination that offers constellations of stimulating links to popular (and not so popular) culture; a group blog dedicated to culture: art, design, music, food, architecture, science, travel, movies, books, typography, politics, etc.; inclusive of geezers!; a delightful mixture of orange words and pictures of well, the insides of a stuffed animal–delightful all the same; the social network I never thought I’d join.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Scroggins</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/07/doctorow-on-copyright-enforcement.html/comment-page-1#comment-179223</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Scroggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=11600#comment-179223</guid>
		<description>This is good, Andrew. It shows again how the law has not caught up with technology. &lt;i&gt;Murder&lt;/i&gt; is often pretty difficult to prove--but I&#039;m not ready to give up on the notion that it does need to be proved before penalties are meted out. And it does seem, in this particular case, that there should be some comparable penalty for getting it wrong. What was all of that a while back where film bits were being removed (was it at UTube?)--and people had to prove that they actually owned the rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good, Andrew. It shows again how the law has not caught up with technology. <i>Murder</i> is often pretty difficult to prove&#8211;but I&#8217;m not ready to give up on the notion that it does need to be proved before penalties are meted out. And it does seem, in this particular case, that there should be some comparable penalty for getting it wrong. What was all of that a while back where film bits were being removed (was it at UTube?)&#8211;and people had to prove that they actually owned the rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.922 seconds -->
