<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Signals Strong Support for NASA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/09/obama-signals-strong-support-for-nasa.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/09/obama-signals-strong-support-for-nasa.html</link>
	<description>a site about everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan McNicol</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/09/obama-signals-strong-support-for-nasa.html/comment-page-1#comment-254126</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan McNicol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=13473#comment-254126</guid>
		<description>Oh, no, no. Obama is ideologically significantly to the right of me. There are plenty of reasons not to vote for him. Nader has my vote at the moment.

When politicos or the press refer to &#039;the undecideds,&#039; I generally hear that as a euphemism for &#039;the idiots.&#039; There have been times in this campaign, though (more so than in others), that I feel myself slipping toward undecided-dom (though certainly not in the way politicians and the media mean it).

My point is that I can see voting for this guy despite the ways I disagree with him more than I&#039;ve ever been able to see that in the past with other candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, no, no. Obama is ideologically significantly to the right of me. There are plenty of reasons not to vote for him. Nader has my vote at the moment.</p>
<p>When politicos or the press refer to &#8216;the undecideds,&#8217; I generally hear that as a euphemism for &#8216;the idiots.&#8217; There have been times in this campaign, though (more so than in others), that I feel myself slipping toward undecided-dom (though certainly not in the way politicians and the media mean it).</p>
<p>My point is that I can see voting for this guy despite the ways I disagree with him more than I&#8217;ve ever been able to see that in the past with other candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deron Bauman</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/09/obama-signals-strong-support-for-nasa.html/comment-page-1#comment-254124</link>
		<dc:creator>Deron Bauman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=13473#comment-254124</guid>
		<description>the past eight years didn&#039;t have an impact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the past eight years didn&#8217;t have an impact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Scroggins</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2008/09/obama-signals-strong-support-for-nasa.html/comment-page-1#comment-254102</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Scroggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=13473#comment-254102</guid>
		<description>Harder &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; to vote for him? Are you finding that you have to look real hard for reasons? McCain&#039;s idea of space is the parts of auditoriums the cameras are not allowed to track to at his speeches because they are empty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harder <i>not</i> to vote for him? Are you finding that you have to look real hard for reasons? McCain&#8217;s idea of space is the parts of auditoriums the cameras are not allowed to track to at his speeches because they are empty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

