March 24, 2009
Against Sports Fans
Marx was wrong: The opiate of the masses isn’t religion, but spectator sports. What else explains the astounding fact that millions of seemingly intelligent human beings feel that the athletic exertions of total strangers are somehow consequential for themselves? The real question we should be asking during the madness surrounding this month’s collegiate basketball championship season is not who will win, but why anyone cares.
comments
Leave a Reply


Note to self: Do not bring up the Pych Dept. bracket pool around Dave. Unless you want to get into another uncomfortable conversation about titties.
And academics wonder why they’re so often accused of rank elitism.
I would hate my life if everything I did was rational…
I haven’t read the full article, but I think this idea goes deeper than a superficial argument for either rationale or emotion. I think the point is vicariousness. How people live through the abilities and achievements of others, how sports become a distraction from one’s own life, and how people are always looking for success to revel in, even if it is not your own.
Now, you can take your Marx and shove it up your arse as far as I’m concerned, but I don’t see anything elitist about asking some fundamental and interesting questions about sports, just because they’re popular.