April 20, 2009
Disease or childbirth may follow
From the American Society for Social Hygiene, 1926. (Via Studio on Fire)
comments
Leave a Reply
comments:
- Sheila Ryan: Oowh, my stomach!
- Robert Ledgerwood: I’ve been keeping my spirits up for the last couple days with the first four minutes of...
- Kelsey Parker: Whew, that fable made me sad.
- Sheila Ryan: Y’all, that goat’s still a-runnin’. I checked.
- Sheila Ryan: My new meditation: Two hours: Goat. Two minutes: Sheep. Two hours: Deron. Two minutes: Sheep. Repeat...
- Sheila Ryan: I am definitely getting to that point.
- Cindy Scroggins: If you watch this enough times, it begins to change. Like that running goat.
- Sheila Ryan: It will be wildly successful.
- Deron Bauman: I’ll create an app.
- Sheila Ryan: I know I want it on my phone.
- Deron Bauman: if I can get all of it off of my phone, I’ll upload the whole thing.
- Cindy Scroggins: Can you email another chunk? Or is this all we get to see? If this were a series, I would watch it.
- Cindy Scroggins: It’s just getting better and better. Thank you, Amanda Mae.
- Cindy Scroggins: It’s too funny. I’m gonna watch it again.
- Sheila Ryan: I’m just sitting here laughing all by myself, and I don’t care who hears me.
Know the men you associate with.
Well, do you?
Autoriding.
Autoriding sounds exciting.
Well, in 1926, I’m guessing there were more cads than condoms about. A girl had to look out for herself. It’s the “social hygiene” bit that I find, well, evocative.
Did you read this?
We have had this much information on MEN since the early 20′s?
Men selfsih.. who knew?
Valerie. Please clarify.
As an exercise, I began by listing the middle names of the men I have associated with, and their current occupations. I have omitted them in the interest of discretion. That I could do so for each of them is reassuring, but the length of the list is something I prefer to keep to myself.