<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Defense of Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/04/the-defense-of-twitter.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/04/the-defense-of-twitter.html</link>
	<description>a site about everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Simone</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/04/the-defense-of-twitter.html/comment-page-1#comment-451799</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=22866#comment-451799</guid>
		<description>I neglected to mention &lt;a href=&quot;http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-other-half-writes-in-defense-of.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Geoff Manaugh&#039;s thoughts&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://waxy.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Waxy&lt;/a&gt;):

&lt;em&gt;&quot;First, on the most obvious level, Twitter needs to be differentiated from what people write on Twitter. The fact that so many people now use Twitter as a public email system, or as a way to instant-message their friends in front of other people, is immaterial; Twitter is a note-taking technology, end of story. You take short-form notes with it, limited to 140 characters. The clichéd analogy here has been with Japanese haiku, but perhaps we might even reference the Oulipo: in other words, Twitter means that you are writing, but you are writing within constraints.&quot;&lt;/eM&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I neglected to mention <a href="http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-other-half-writes-in-defense-of.html" rel="nofollow">Geoff Manaugh&#8217;s thoughts</a> (via <a href="http://waxy.org" rel="nofollow">Waxy</a>):</p>
<p><em>&#8220;First, on the most obvious level, Twitter needs to be differentiated from what people write on Twitter. The fact that so many people now use Twitter as a public email system, or as a way to instant-message their friends in front of other people, is immaterial; Twitter is a note-taking technology, end of story. You take short-form notes with it, limited to 140 characters. The clichéd analogy here has been with Japanese haiku, but perhaps we might even reference the Oulipo: in other words, Twitter means that you are writing, but you are writing within constraints.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

