<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Clusterflock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html</link>
	<description>a site about everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:21:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: raynor</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-522298</link>
		<dc:creator>raynor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-522298</guid>
		<description>daryl, like you, i can&#039;t get enough of nomenclature. my current favourites are typography-based (viz. the sagitta (horizontal bar) of an E, the tittle (dot) of an i, or the crotch of an M.) &lt;a href=&quot;http://ilovetypography.com/2008/03/21/extreme-type-terminology/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; article is filled with all sorts of sparkling gems (a metaphor) along these lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>daryl, like you, i can&#8217;t get enough of nomenclature. my current favourites are typography-based (viz. the sagitta (horizontal bar) of an E, the tittle (dot) of an i, or the crotch of an M.) <a href="http://ilovetypography.com/2008/03/21/extreme-type-terminology/" rel="nofollow">this</a> article is filled with all sorts of sparkling gems (a metaphor) along these lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521916</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521916</guid>
		<description>Derek, what you wonder makes sense, and it fascinates me, especially as I have grown close to transgender folk and have come to think more and more that many distinctions are just a question of degree and of the intensity of one&#039;s desire to embrace one&#039;s various selves.

Believing, as I do, that the unitary self is a fiction even greater than that of a multiplicity of selves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek, what you wonder makes sense, and it fascinates me, especially as I have grown close to transgender folk and have come to think more and more that many distinctions are just a question of degree and of the intensity of one&#8217;s desire to embrace one&#8217;s various selves.</p>
<p>Believing, as I do, that the unitary self is a fiction even greater than that of a multiplicity of selves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek White</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521903</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521903</guid>
		<description>speaking of people impersonating people impersonating people... yesterday I was wondering (under the influence of The Crying Game and some of the characters running around the meat packing district during gay pride) if there is a classification of transgender people, like men who think they are women pretending to be men, or women who are men pretending to be women, because I saw a few people over the weekend that seem to fit that classification. Does that make sense? Surely Deron would know the answer to this. I fear I might fall into this classification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of people impersonating people impersonating people&#8230; yesterday I was wondering (under the influence of The Crying Game and some of the characters running around the meat packing district during gay pride) if there is a classification of transgender people, like men who think they are women pretending to be men, or women who are men pretending to be women, because I saw a few people over the weekend that seem to fit that classification. Does that make sense? Surely Deron would know the answer to this. I fear I might fall into this classification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521877</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521877</guid>
		<description>The friendly wind is a friend to us all. So long as it is friendly, I say, &quot;Blow, friendly wind! Blow where thou mayest!&quot;

(How was that for an impersonation of Cooper Renner? Or an impersonation of Cooper Renner impersonating someone or other . . . .)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The friendly wind is a friend to us all. So long as it is friendly, I say, &#8220;Blow, friendly wind! Blow where thou mayest!&#8221;</p>
<p>(How was that for an impersonation of Cooper Renner? Or an impersonation of Cooper Renner impersonating someone or other . . . .)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek White</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521872</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521872</guid>
		<description>We could probably have this discussion strictly with words with a cock suffix. Like just now I was reading this story about weathercocks:
http://teacher.scholastic.com/writewit/mff/folktale_almafolktale.htm 

Is it just me or is the ending rather Freudian for school kids? 

&quot;And from that day on, weathercocks have stood on their only leg, seeing everything that happens below, and pointing whichever way their friend the wind blows.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could probably have this discussion strictly with words with a cock suffix. Like just now I was reading this story about weathercocks:<br />
<a href="http://teacher.scholastic.com/writewit/mff/folktale_almafolktale.htm" rel="nofollow">http://teacher.scholastic.com/writewit/mff/folktale_almafolktale.htm</a> </p>
<p>Is it just me or is the ending rather Freudian for school kids? </p>
<p>&#8220;And from that day on, weathercocks have stood on their only leg, seeing everything that happens below, and pointing whichever way their friend the wind blows.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521869</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521869</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Philtrum&lt;/em&gt; puts me in mind of &lt;em&gt;philter&lt;/em&gt; (or &lt;em&gt;philtre&lt;/em&gt;). From Middle French &lt;em&gt;philtre&lt;/em&gt;, from Latin &lt;em&gt;philtrum&lt;/em&gt;, from Greek &lt;em&gt;philtron&lt;/em&gt;; akin to Greek philosophy &lt;em&gt;dear&lt;/em&gt;. Date: circa 1587.

1 : a potion credited with magical power 2 : a potion, drug, or charm held to have the power to arouse sexual passion 

So says your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/philter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Merriam-Webster&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Philtrum</em> puts me in mind of <em>philter</em> (or <em>philtre</em>). From Middle French <em>philtre</em>, from Latin <em>philtrum</em>, from Greek <em>philtron</em>; akin to Greek philosophy <em>dear</em>. Date: circa 1587.</p>
<p>1 : a potion credited with magical power 2 : a potion, drug, or charm held to have the power to arouse sexual passion </p>
<p>So says your <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/philter" rel="nofollow">Merriam-Webster</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Scroggins</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521845</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Scroggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521845</guid>
		<description>Chris--thanks so much for that Phillip Kerr sentence. Splendidly bad. And your spelling correction reminds me of many similar cases I have experience--and often with the same sense that &lt;i&gt;I liked my way better&lt;/i&gt;!

Andrew-- &quot;hapax legomenon&quot; sounds like a sorcerer&#039;s incantation, and this seems to fit the nature of the phrase, much as a palindrome seems inherently more &quot;magical&#039; than other odd ways of phrasing the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris&#8211;thanks so much for that Phillip Kerr sentence. Splendidly bad. And your spelling correction reminds me of many similar cases I have experience&#8211;and often with the same sense that <i>I liked my way better</i>!</p>
<p>Andrew&#8211; &#8220;hapax legomenon&#8221; sounds like a sorcerer&#8217;s incantation, and this seems to fit the nature of the phrase, much as a palindrome seems inherently more &#8220;magical&#8217; than other odd ways of phrasing the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Simone</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521835</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521835</guid>
		<description>Euclid discusses the gnomon at great lengths in his &lt;em&gt;Elements&lt;/eM&gt;. What is amazing is that all of his work in Book 4 (I could be wrong about the number) is essentially algebra before the abstraction.

One of my favorites is a bit of a mouthful and two word phrase: &lt;b&gt;hapax legomenon&lt;/b&gt;, &quot;a word which occurs only once in either the written record of a language, the works of an author, or in a single text.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Euclid discusses the gnomon at great lengths in his <em>Elements</em>. What is amazing is that all of his work in Book 4 (I could be wrong about the number) is essentially algebra before the abstraction.</p>
<p>One of my favorites is a bit of a mouthful and two word phrase: <b>hapax legomenon</b>, &#8220;a word which occurs only once in either the written record of a language, the works of an author, or in a single text.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521818</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521818</guid>
		<description>Also, while writing that post I discovered that I&#039;d been spelling philtrum wrong [as filtrum] for over a decade. I think I like it less with the &#039;ph&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, while writing that post I discovered that I&#8217;d been spelling philtrum wrong [as filtrum] for over a decade. I think I like it less with the &#8216;ph&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/06/dear-clusterflock-261.html/comment-page-1#comment-521817</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26854#comment-521817</guid>
		<description>The obscure name I revere the most is gnomon, which is the upright part of a sundial that casts the shadow. I first heard this word about 12 years ago, when Phillip Kerr won the Bad Sex in Fiction award for this magnificent prose:

&quot;Detaching mind from over-eager gnomon and its exquisitely appointed, shadowy task, he began to make love to her.&quot;

Yerk!

I also like philtrum, which is the vertical indentation above one&#039;s upper lip.

I think the more finely grained your vocabulary is, the more observant of the world you can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obscure name I revere the most is gnomon, which is the upright part of a sundial that casts the shadow. I first heard this word about 12 years ago, when Phillip Kerr won the Bad Sex in Fiction award for this magnificent prose:</p>
<p>&#8220;Detaching mind from over-eager gnomon and its exquisitely appointed, shadowy task, he began to make love to her.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yerk!</p>
<p>I also like philtrum, which is the vertical indentation above one&#8217;s upper lip.</p>
<p>I think the more finely grained your vocabulary is, the more observant of the world you can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

