<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Previously Kinetic Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html</link>
	<description>a site about everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavan</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-523751</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26908#comment-523751</guid>
		<description>Bird (II), for those interested, is a Northern Flicker  (&lt;i&gt;Colaptes auratus &lt;/i&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bird (II), for those interested, is a Northern Flicker  (<i>Colaptes auratus </i>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: from the comments : clusterflock</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-523182</link>
		<dc:creator>from the comments : clusterflock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26908#comment-523182</guid>
		<description>[...] Lucy Foley: You know, I took a picture of a dead/dying thrush, not entirely unlike Bird (II) yesterday, too. Funny to see these on your flickr this morning. But mine was just with a camera phone, nothing fancy, and it didn’t come out particularly well. The really peculiar thing is that I swore, just after I took the picture – putting it really all up in the dead bird’s face and everything – that I saw the bird’s eyes just sort of drop, like the very last bit of life just fell out of it. Right after the picture. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lucy Foley: You know, I took a picture of a dead/dying thrush, not entirely unlike Bird (II) yesterday, too. Funny to see these on your flickr this morning. But mine was just with a camera phone, nothing fancy, and it didn’t come out particularly well. The really peculiar thing is that I swore, just after I took the picture – putting it really all up in the dead bird’s face and everything – that I saw the bird’s eyes just sort of drop, like the very last bit of life just fell out of it. Right after the picture. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-523178</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26908#comment-523178</guid>
		<description>India, I have higher resolution versions I could print for you and would be happy to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India, I have higher resolution versions I could print for you and would be happy to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-523177</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26908#comment-523177</guid>
		<description>I expect that is what you did see, Lucy. It is a subtle but generally unmistakable moment.

As for the merits of cam-phones versus big-girl cameras in these situations, I deliberately took a little pain to blur these just a bit, in part to merge each bird with its background slightly but also because not to have done so felt invasive to me. More invasive than what I was doing already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect that is what you did see, Lucy. It is a subtle but generally unmistakable moment.</p>
<p>As for the merits of cam-phones versus big-girl cameras in these situations, I deliberately took a little pain to blur these just a bit, in part to merge each bird with its background slightly but also because not to have done so felt invasive to me. More invasive than what I was doing already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: India</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-523171</link>
		<dc:creator>India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26908#comment-523171</guid>
		<description>So are these, indeed, high enough resolution for prints? If so, I would like a set, myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are these, indeed, high enough resolution for prints? If so, I would like a set, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-523160</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26908#comment-523160</guid>
		<description>You know, I took a picture of a dead/dying thrush, not entirely unlike Bird (II) yesterday, too. Funny to see these on your flickr this morning. But mine was just with a camera phone, nothing fancy, and it didn&#039;t come out particularly well. The really peculiar thing is that I swore, just after I took the picture - putting it really all up in the dead bird&#039;s face and everything -  that I saw the bird&#039;s eyes just sort of drop, like the very last bit of life just fell out of it. Right after the picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I took a picture of a dead/dying thrush, not entirely unlike Bird (II) yesterday, too. Funny to see these on your flickr this morning. But mine was just with a camera phone, nothing fancy, and it didn&#8217;t come out particularly well. The really peculiar thing is that I swore, just after I took the picture &#8211; putting it really all up in the dead bird&#8217;s face and everything &#8211;  that I saw the bird&#8217;s eyes just sort of drop, like the very last bit of life just fell out of it. Right after the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-523141</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26908#comment-523141</guid>
		<description>They are so sad and so beautiful that I think I must make a couple of prints for Cindy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are so sad and so beautiful that I think I must make a couple of prints for Cindy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: India</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/07/previously-kinetic-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-523132</link>
		<dc:creator>India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=26908#comment-523132</guid>
		<description>These really are gorgeous. That Lena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These really are gorgeous. That Lena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

