<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: writing, editing, and beauty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/09/writing-editing-and-beauty.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/09/writing-editing-and-beauty.html</link>
	<description>a site about everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trying to Pull it Together : clusterflock</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/09/writing-editing-and-beauty.html/comment-page-1#comment-617138</link>
		<dc:creator>Trying to Pull it Together : clusterflock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=31657#comment-617138</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew posted  this.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andrew posted  this.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: range</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/09/writing-editing-and-beauty.html/comment-page-1#comment-616248</link>
		<dc:creator>range</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=31657#comment-616248</guid>
		<description>Nope you&#039;re right. In a sense, writing for blogs doesn&#039;t really need to be beautiful. It needs to capture the reader&#039;s attention. You won&#039;t find beautiful prose on most blogs. However, there is a rawness that you get from them, that doesn&#039;t really translate well to edition. 

Anyway, I don&#039;t think that editors are going to disappear. They refine writing while writers create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope you&#8217;re right. In a sense, writing for blogs doesn&#8217;t really need to be beautiful. It needs to capture the reader&#8217;s attention. You won&#8217;t find beautiful prose on most blogs. However, there is a rawness that you get from them, that doesn&#8217;t really translate well to edition. </p>
<p>Anyway, I don&#8217;t think that editors are going to disappear. They refine writing while writers create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deron Bauman</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2009/09/writing-editing-and-beauty.html/comment-page-1#comment-616237</link>
		<dc:creator>Deron Bauman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterflock.org/?p=31657#comment-616237</guid>
		<description>false binary indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>false binary indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

