comments

1. Andrew Simone on November 13th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

   Sounds about my size.

2. Deron Bauman on November 13th, 2009 at 1:54 pm

   you’re 33 waist?

3. Deron Bauman on November 13th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

   they are very baggy on me.

4. Andrew Simone on November 13th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

   Man, I used to be. I must have lost weight since the Levi’s I am wearing, upon inspection, are 32s and a little baggy. So, um, never mind.

5. Andrew Simone on November 13th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

   The idea of me losing weight is a bit disturbing.

6. Michael Smith on November 13th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

   Andrew, sub 32? Do you find that you have trouble finding pants? I’m probably a 31 x 34 but always buy 32 x 34′s and have to search…apparently I’m just too tall and too skinny.

7. Cindy Scroggins on November 13th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

   I know you’re right, Michael. I used to like the fit of men’s jeans, but it was hard to find my size–28 x 34. The length was the kicker.

   May I say to all of you skinny men and women that, if one day you find that your body had suddenly changed and you resemble a puffer fish, do not–I repeat, do not–decide to save your skinny jeans because you’re sure they’ll fit one day. They will not fit, and down the line you might find yourself throwing a tantrum in your closet that leads to the neighbors calling the police because they heard noises and you say the wrong thing to the cops because of all that bourbon you drank in the closet while you ripped your skinny clothes off of their hangers and threw them out the window. Perhaps.

8. Deron Bauman on November 13th, 2009 at 3:04 pm

   thank you.

9. Cindy Scroggins on November 13th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

   You’re welcome. That’s why I’m here, to offer sage advice.

10. Michael Smith on November 13th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Where would we be without you?

11. Cindy Scroggins on November 13th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Baltimore, maybe.

12. Andrew Simone on November 13th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    I do on occasion have problems finding pants that fit well. Also, shirts. I am not only skinny, but long armed.

13. Michael Smith on November 13th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    I have that problem too. And cycling jersey’s, I’m too thin for a Medium, but most smalls leave room for a tramp stamp when I’m in the drops.

14. Mike Dresser on November 13th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    That’s the size I’ve been buying lately. I could PayPal you some shipping and show your pants the town.

15. Deron Bauman on November 13th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    perfect. send me an email with your address and I’ll get them on the way. no worries about shipping.

16. Derek White on November 13th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    are all clusterflock guys 32×34? that’s about me too, though lately i’ve been cutting new holes in my belt to keep my pants on.

17. Dave Vogt on November 13th, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    I like a 31×32 for wearing, but if I’m to wear it without a belt it’s typically a 30. My actual length probably closer to 30 than 32, but I hate the ankle breeze.

18. Deron Bauman on November 13th, 2009 at 11:01 pm

    I’m 32×32.

19. Amanda Mae Meyncke on November 15th, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    I know many men with this sub 32 problem, super tall super skinny.

    Someone needs to invent the opposite of Big And Tall, sort of a dark-wood lined, lit by candle chandelier, Slender and Towering

20. Colin on November 16th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    I’m 32×34 as well. Better than the other way around, I suppose.

21. Rick Neece on November 16th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    Dear Colin
    I was once a 32×34, I got older and more sedentary. My own fault. I’m 38×34 now. I’d be happy with a 36 waist, a 34 anymore seems unreachable. On a brighter note. I have lost 6 lbs. in the past three or four weeks.

Leave a Reply