September 20, 2010
Let’s Kill Interruptive Ads
Here’s what I believe: It doesn’t matter how much money interruptive ads make for publications on the Web. They sap the readers’ tolerance and good will, and any unnecessary amount of that is too high a price to pay. (Videos? Okay, we’re used to that on TV. But serious text-based pubs like Salon and Freeman should chill.)
Here’s what I believe: the biggest challenge the web (and media in general) will have to face over the next ten years is the gradual realization that advertisements aren’t anywhere close to being as useful or effective as we thought they were.
comments
Leave a Reply


Sadly, I noticed the typo in the headline one second after hitting “Publish”.
I could fix it. But…Cindy?
I don’t even know what you are talking about, Michael.
Goddammit.
I fixed it.
Thank you, Michael
We’re all lucky Cindy didn’t see it.
Trust me.
Oh, my god. It involved an apostrophe, didn’t it? If the apostrophe was simply missing, I would have been okay. But if an apostrophe was misplaced–well, it’s good I didn’t see it.
The apostrophe in “Let’s” was omitted accidentally, and I was unable to fix it because Christopher Walken doesn’t have privileges to edit his posts.
Well, okay, it was just a typo. Thank you, Joel. That’s not a big deal. I’m not going over the drum-set on this one, despite Michael’s efforts to get me all riled up. He has the devil in his eye, you know. Or a worm.
And I’m all for killing interruptive ads.
With lasers.
Joel, it’s really difficult to get Cindy riled up if you’re going to tell her what really happened.
He’ll learn.