February 18, 2011

Ask a law librarian

Caller: “I need t’ know whut ya gotta do to get a annulment.”

Librarian: “There are 7 grounds for annulment. Number one: underage.  Number two: under the influence of alcohol or narcotics.  Number three: impotency.  Number four: fraud, duress, or force.  Number five: mental incapacity.  Number six: concealed divorce.  Number seven: marriage less than 72 hours after issuance of license.”

Caller: “Oh, uh, oh, Freud!  I think it was Freud!  What do Freud include?”

Librarian: “Something like immigration fraud.”

Caller: “He’s black.”

Librarian: “And?”

Caller: “O.K., mental incapacity.”

Librarian: “You will have to prove it.”

Caller: “How do I prove I ain’t right in my right mind?”

Librarian: “Get some kind of proof from a doctor.”

Caller: “What kinda doctor?  A crazy doctor?”

Librarian: “Any doctor.”

Caller: “Hmm.  Which one you think I fit into?”

Librarian: “I can’t determine that.  Do you want me to read the 7 grounds again?”

Caller: “Yeah.”

[Librarian reads the grounds for annulment again]

Caller: “O.K., I think thisn here’ll work.  72 hours.”  [musingly]  “twenty-fo, uh, thirty-six” [incoherent mutter] “fo-ty-eight…Seventy two f’om the first day, or the third day?”

Librarian: “What?

comments

  1. Sheila Ryan on February 18th, 2011 at 4:38 pm

    That’s it, Cindy. That’s it.

    I’ve been teetering on the brink all day long, and you just pushed me over.

  2. Cindy Scroggins on February 18th, 2011 at 4:44 pm

    Sorry. Brink pushin’s my strong suit.

  3. Phil Bebbington on February 18th, 2011 at 4:47 pm

    Oh, man! And just before bed as well – I can feel a restless night coming on!

  4. Sheila Ryan on February 18th, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    Hey, it works, Cindy. Brink-teetering and occasional tumbling — they’re my stock in trade.

  5. Sheila Ryan on February 18th, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    Immigration Freud.

  6. Deron Bauman on February 18th, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    Seventy two from the first or third day.

  7. Joel Bernstein on February 18th, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    “What kinda doctor? A crazy doctor?”

  8. Deron Bauman on February 18th, 2011 at 5:17 pm

    Redundant.

  9. Marco on February 18th, 2011 at 7:44 pm

    I just don’t know for sure.

    If it’s a work of fiction – it’s brilliant.

    If it’s a work of recollection – it’s brilliant.

  10. Cindy Scroggins on February 19th, 2011 at 8:48 am

    Marco, it’s a work of recollection with a touch of literary editing on my part. The law librarian who recounts these tales is constitutionally incapable of lying. She has both Asperger Syndrome and OCD, so every detail is precisely captured.

Leave a Reply


Ads via The Deck